Went for a test drive.

Feel free to post anything unrelated to wet shaving or men's grooming (I.e. cars, watches, pens, leather goods. You know, the finer things of life).
User avatar
jww
Woolly Bully
Posts: 10960
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 10:49 am
Location: Ottawa, Canada

Post by jww »

I try to wax a couple of times a year --- it helps but doesn't eliminate chips and scratches, the bane of my existence where my cars are concerned.
Wendell

Resident Wool Fat Evangelist & anglophile. Have you hugged a sheep today?
User avatar
GA Russell
Posts: 3070
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 10:15 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC

Post by GA Russell »

The Honda salesman told me that too, Murray.
Rapira Swedish Supersteel
Fitness
Lijun badger
Gillette 1948-1950 Super Speed
User avatar
rustyblade
Shaving Paparazzo
Posts: 10472
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 5:27 pm
Location: Ontario

Post by rustyblade »

jww wrote:
Daytime running lights have long been the law here in Canada, as well as parts of Europe. Denmark, as an example, reported 7% reduction in accidents because vehicles are more visible to each other. But if you look hard enough, you can find evidence that suggests they don't make any difference at all. All I know is that I have driven with my lights on constantly for many years. My cars now have automatic lights that shut off when I turn the vehicle off. Works for me ... I admit to liking the difference in visibility of other drivers when their car has DRLs installed. ymmv.
Judging by how many people drive in daytime fog, or a snow flurry, and fail to turn their lights on, I'm thankful for DRLs. It doesn't harm anyone. Last couple vehicles I've had use the orange "parking lights" as their daytime runners, I prefer this.
+1 on the shout out for the new Escape. Nice looking, and well equipped. I like how Ford has taken their "world car" approach from the Escort of the 80s to now --- they are actually putting some very nice cars on the road these days. Honestly, they are.
I recently read: American Icon: Alan Mulally and the Fight to Save Ford Motor Company by Bryce Hoffman. It is a recent book and details how Alan Mulally turned around Ford. Great book for anyone interested in autos and changed my view on Ford vehicles entirely.
Richard
User avatar
Sam
M'Learned Friend
Posts: 12017
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2004 9:13 am
Location: memphis, tennessee
Contact:

Post by Sam »

Interesting Richard. Maybe I can get it on Kindle. Got some books that were easily transported to my Kindle, reading the Steve Jobs book now.
User avatar
rustyblade
Shaving Paparazzo
Posts: 10472
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 5:27 pm
Location: Ontario

Post by rustyblade »

Sam wrote:Interesting Richard. Maybe I can get it on Kindle. Got some books that were easily transported to my Kindle, reading the Steve Jobs book now.
I read it on my Kindle. If you enjoyed Steve Jobs, you will enjoy the book on Alan Mulally.
Richard
User avatar
dosco
Posts: 581
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 8:02 am
Location: Maryland

Post by dosco »

rustyblade wrote:I recently read: American Icon: Alan Mulally and the Fight to Save Ford Motor Company by Bryce Hoffman. It is a recent book and details how Alan Mulally turned around Ford. Great book for anyone interested in autos and changed my view on Ford vehicles entirely.
I will check this out.

NPR had a regular piece called "Interviews from the Corner Office" or somesuch where the interviewee was the CEO of a company. One was an interview with Alan Mulally perhaps a year or two after he took over Ford. It was fascinating (could be available as a podcast from NPR ... dunno), the one thing from the interview that blew my mind was when he described having his first meeting and asking about how Ford matched their production capacity to projected demand. The answer was that they didn't and had been overproducing trucks and SUVs for years ... that's about the time that Ford initiated the shutdown of something like 18 plants. Shocker.
User avatar
dosco
Posts: 581
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 8:02 am
Location: Maryland

Post by dosco »

The wife and I have moved to Honda and Toyota cars. We were "loyal" American car buyers but the vehicles in the mid to late 1990s and early 2000s forced our hand.

We drove Saturns until kid #1's baby carrier was too big for the Saturn, we considered the larger Saturn but instead went with a Camry. I only got rid of that thing last year ... had driven it for something like 11 years.

The other car was in reality a parade of SUVs. First had a 1997 Ford Exploder ... err ... Explorer. Then went to a 2002 Explorer. My wife was nearly hit driving it, so she went to the IIHS website and found that the Honda Odyssey was a "top safety pick." Went and got one of those and took a bath on the trade in ... Fords (at the time) had horrible resale value. The Odyssey had a smaller engine (3.5L V-6 versus the Ford's 4.0L V-6) and weighed something like 1,000 lbs less than the Explorer ... and was faster, more fuel efficient, and has much more interior room than the Ford. Plus the resale value is excellent.

I unloaded the Camry and got a Honda Accord, the 4 cylinder with a stick shift. The thing is great (although I really wanted a Corvette. Someday.).

I drove the Hyundai Elantra about 2 years ago while on a business trip, I liked its styling and driveability, but found the interior ergonomics to be unacceptable.

Toyota Yaris ... ugh. Horrible.

Toyota Matrix ... OK except for interior ergonomics.

YMMV.
User avatar
rustyblade
Shaving Paparazzo
Posts: 10472
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 5:27 pm
Location: Ontario

Post by rustyblade »

dosco wrote:
NPR had a regular piece called "Interviews from the Corner Office" or somesuch where the interviewee was the CEO of a company. One was an interview with Alan Mulally perhaps a year or two after he took over Ford. It was fascinating (could be available as a podcast from NPR ... dunno), the one thing from the interview that blew my mind was when he described having his first meeting and asking about how Ford matched their production capacity to projected demand. The answer was that they didn't and had been overproducing trucks and SUVs for years ... that's about the time that Ford initiated the shutdown of something like 18 plants. Shocker.
My favourite quote:

"An automobile has about 10,000 moving parts, right? An airplane has two million, and it has to stay up in the air." (on being asked "How are you going to tackle something as complex and unfamiliar as the auto business when we are in such tough financial shape?")
Alan Mulally, 2007
Richard
User avatar
JayTrek
Posts: 837
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 7:38 am
Location: Decatur, AL

Post by JayTrek »

I work for The Boeing Company that Mulally left to go to Ford. He was vital to Boeing Commercial Aircraft keeping its footing while the nation recovered from 9-11. He was very smart and quite the dynamic personality. I did get to meet him once when he was at my site for a visit before he left. Probably one of the best all hands meetings I have attended. Part of his charisma is that he, in general, approaches things with common sense, and has a reputation for straight talk.

I was really convinced that he would eventually be the President and CEO of Boeing one day. Obviously the wheels on that process turned a bit too slowly...and he departed for Ford.

In my opinion...for Boeing at least...that was a misstep that we are still paying for today. Just my opinion.
Regards,
Jason

Upon Further Review...
User avatar
dosco
Posts: 581
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 8:02 am
Location: Maryland

Post by dosco »

rustyblade wrote: My favourite quote:

"An automobile has about 10,000 moving parts, right? An airplane has two million, and it has to stay up in the air." (on being asked "How are you going to tackle something as complex and unfamiliar as the auto business when we are in such tough financial shape?")
Alan Mulally, 2007
Now that you mention it I remember this also.

Definitely funny to hear how self-inflated people become when isolated in their industry's stovepipe. I see this with the shipbuilding industry as well.
User avatar
fallingwickets
Clive the Thumb
Posts: 8813
Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 11:59 am

Post by fallingwickets »

thanks for the book rec

clive
de gustibus non est disputandum
User avatar
GA Russell
Posts: 3070
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 10:15 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC

Post by GA Russell »

Of the four mid-size sport sedans I drove, the Honda felt the worst - the ride was too firm for me. But everything that I read indicates that the 2013 Accord is the one to get.

So I went back to the Honda dealer today and test drove the base Accord (the LX), and liked it better. Then the salesman suggested that I drive another sport Accord, so I drove one with a six-speed manual. I liked the ride of that one too, maybe just a little bit better than that of the LX. So apparently the SX I drove the other day was not typical, and for me not as good a car.

The sticker price of the LX was $23,000, and today's SX was $24,000.

Going from memory, I would say that the ride of all of the sedans I drove was satisfactory. I think I would still rate the Hyundai Sonata as the best, but not enough better to get me to buy it.

I saw an AOL article the other day regarding the top ten 2013 vehicles you can expect to keep for 300,000 miles. #1 was the Accord, and #3 was the Camry. #2 was a General Motors truck as I recall.
Rapira Swedish Supersteel
Fitness
Lijun badger
Gillette 1948-1950 Super Speed
User avatar
jww
Woolly Bully
Posts: 10960
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 10:49 am
Location: Ottawa, Canada

Post by jww »

So -- my one observation here is that if two identical cars from the same dealer drive differently, what is really going on in Honda manufacturing? Sounds like the old GM days when you would drive every model of the car you wanted which was on the lot and took the one that felt/drove the best.
Wendell

Resident Wool Fat Evangelist & anglophile. Have you hugged a sheep today?
User avatar
dosco
Posts: 581
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 8:02 am
Location: Maryland

Post by dosco »

jww wrote:So -- my one observation here is that if two identical cars from the same dealer drive differently, what is really going on in Honda manufacturing? Sounds like the old GM days when you would drive every model of the car you wanted which was on the lot and took the one that felt/drove the best.
It's unlikely that different models (4 door vice 2 door "sport" model) would drive the same. The 2 door had a 6 speed manual (my 4-cylinder, 4 door, has a 5-speed manual), and the sport version he drove may also have had the 6 cylinder. Different weight distributions, different tires, etc.

Also, people are notoriously unreliable in the "giving kinesthetic feedback" department. Just watch a season of Formula 1 racing and you'll see what I mean.

I'd doubt that anything went seriously awry with Honda's manufacturing (although it's certainly not out of the range of possibilities).
User avatar
GA Russell
Posts: 3070
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 10:15 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC

Post by GA Russell »

Well, one standard that I used was what I am used to - my current car, a 1987 Camry.

The Sonata was more comfortable, but the first Accord was less comfortable.
Rapira Swedish Supersteel
Fitness
Lijun badger
Gillette 1948-1950 Super Speed
User avatar
jww
Woolly Bully
Posts: 10960
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 10:49 am
Location: Ottawa, Canada

Post by jww »

I clearly missed you tried a 2-door and 4-door -- -for some reason I thought they were both 4-doors. I stand corrected.
Wendell

Resident Wool Fat Evangelist & anglophile. Have you hugged a sheep today?
User avatar
fallingwickets
Clive the Thumb
Posts: 8813
Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 11:59 am

Post by fallingwickets »

so I drove one with a six-speed manual.
as an aside, i parked next to a mini yesterday and was horrified to see that it wasnt manual.....seriously!,they shouldnt sell a mini with automatic gears.....ughhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

clive
de gustibus non est disputandum
User avatar
rustyblade
Shaving Paparazzo
Posts: 10472
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 5:27 pm
Location: Ontario

Post by rustyblade »

fallingwickets wrote:
so I drove one with a six-speed manual.
as an aside, i parked next to a mini yesterday and was horrified to see that it wasnt manual.....seriously!,they shouldnt sell a mini with automatic gears.....ughhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

clive
If the vehicle is a daily driver and if you are in stop and go traffic, I would take an auto over stick all the time. Also, automatics have become so advanced that they are often more fuel efficient than vehicles equipped with manuals.

If you buy a mini and plan to drive on curvy mountain roads all day long, then by all means, get the stick.
Richard
gsgo
Posts: 2787
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 9:18 am
Location: Chicago, IL

Post by gsgo »

Our 2013 Honda Accord EX-L with the CVT transmission is very good and the best of all we tested. I was not a big fan of CVT's but this next generation is headed in the right direction.
Good shaving,

Gary
User avatar
jww
Woolly Bully
Posts: 10960
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 10:49 am
Location: Ottawa, Canada

Post by jww »

rustyblade wrote:...

If you buy a mini and plan to drive on curvy mountain roads all day long, then by all means, get the stick.
When we can, we always by sticks by choice. We just prefer to drive sticks. At the moment we have one of each, but that's mainly due to the fact that the Santa Fe doesn't come with a stick -- and I don't know that I'd want a SUV with a manual in North America. But, I digress -- I still prefer a pure stick with a clutch over the current crop of manu-matics although the Volkswagen DSG box, is reported as being simply fabulous.
Wendell

Resident Wool Fat Evangelist & anglophile. Have you hugged a sheep today?
Post Reply