http://www.bizjournals.com/cincinnati/b ... g-the.htmlEnergizer CEO: P&G is hurting the razor business
"The U.S. razor and blade business is shrinking, and it’s partially Procter & Gamble Co.’s fault, a top competitor said. The problem is “hyper-levels of promotional spending by our leading competitor,” Ward Klein, CEO of Energizer Holdings Inc. (NYSE: ENR), said in an earnings call.
The Town and Country, Mo.-based Energizer makes Schick shaving products. The U.S. razor and blade market declined two tenths of a percent over the last 12 weeks, he said. That was compared with a 52-week growth trend of 1.7 percent."
So is Gillette only able to successfully sell large quantities of its expensive, flagship Fusion razors and refill cartridges when their price is subsidized with promotional support (ie, on sale)? I had read a year or two ago that Fusion hadn't been the home run that Gillette had hoped, partially due to its high price in the face of the great recession. In response, Gillette was changing its marketing to assert that the Fusion will give X number of shaves and as a result is a good value.
And now, in a story line right out of Mad Men, comes the news that Gillette has fired the firm that has handled its advertising for the past 80 years:
http://www.bizjournals.com/cincinnati/n ... gtime.htmlP&G brand parts ways with longtime advertising firm
After a nearly 80-year relationship with BBDO, Procter & Gamble Co. moved its Gillette men’s grooming business to Grey Global Group, Ad Age reports.
Of course none of this is germane to our interests here at SMF, but I thought that news of the 21st Century razor wars might be of interest to some members.