What's wrong with this picture?

What kind of fragrances do you prefer?
Post Reply
brothers
Posts: 17650
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 7:18 am
Location: Oklahoma City USA

What's wrong with this picture?

Post by brothers » Wed Mar 11, 2015 8:11 pm

Just a typo, but still makes one stop and think for a moment. Can you see it? Maybe it's just a joke, but probably not. Anyway I just spotted it yesterday and thought maybe you guys would get a smile out of it. This stuff is a strong menthol, pretty much unscented.

Image
Gary

User avatar
kronos9
Posts: 738
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 11:34 am
Location: UTM Zone 16T

Re: What's wrong with this picture?

Post by kronos9 » Thu Mar 12, 2015 6:22 am

Methanol? Do I win?
Ed

EL Alamein
Posts: 2559
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 7:55 pm

Re: What's wrong with this picture?

Post by EL Alamein » Thu Mar 12, 2015 6:29 pm

kronos9 wrote:Methanol? Do I win?
Winner, winner! Chicken dinner! :)

brothers
Posts: 17650
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 7:18 am
Location: Oklahoma City USA

Re: What's wrong with this picture?

Post by brothers » Thu Mar 12, 2015 6:54 pm

Now if anyone begins questioning why a given shaving product is causing a problem, and there is interest in the ingredients, we can testify that what's in the product is really not guaranteed to be what's printed in the list of ingredients and vice versa. I had read this very short and inexpensive list of ingredients more than once before I "read" it the last time.
Gary

User avatar
TheMonk
Posts: 1213
Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2013 4:44 am
Location: Porto, Portugal

Re: What's wrong with this picture?

Post by TheMonk » Fri Mar 13, 2015 3:16 am

Never did try Snake Bite, but I do like the performance of some of Fine's aftershaves.
David

“Use any means to keep from being a genius, all means to become one.” John Cage

User avatar
Squire
Squadron Leader
Posts: 18969
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 3:41 pm
Location: North East, MS

Re: What's wrong with this picture?

Post by Squire » Fri Mar 13, 2015 7:54 am

In view of the stiff fines and penalties involved a manufacturer would be very foolish to falsely list ingredients on the label. In order to protect proprietary formulas they don't have to list specific percentages but they do have to accurately state what's in there.
Regards,
Squire

brothers
Posts: 17650
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 7:18 am
Location: Oklahoma City USA

Re: What's wrong with this picture?

Post by brothers » Fri Mar 13, 2015 11:36 am

That's what I was thinking. A typographical error could turn into a legal problem.
Gary

mikey
Posts: 292
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 12:06 am

Re: What's wrong with this picture?

Post by mikey » Mon Mar 16, 2015 10:45 pm

Well, lookee here.

It appears Taylor has made the same error.

Thanks,
Mike
Last edited by mikey on Sat May 02, 2015 10:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Squire
Squadron Leader
Posts: 18969
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 3:41 pm
Location: North East, MS

Re: What's wrong with this picture?

Post by Squire » Tue Mar 17, 2015 1:21 pm

Done on purpose I'm sure. Methanol is the primary additive used to denature the other alcohol in the cologne making the whole unfit for human consumption.
Regards,
Squire

brothers
Posts: 17650
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 7:18 am
Location: Oklahoma City USA

Re: What's wrong with this picture?

Post by brothers » Tue Mar 17, 2015 7:19 pm

Maybe Fine's label is correct to a point, in the event theirs actually does contain methanol for a reason, and it may be that the error, if any, is that they omitted the menthol.
Gary

User avatar
Squire
Squadron Leader
Posts: 18969
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 3:41 pm
Location: North East, MS

Re: What's wrong with this picture?

Post by Squire » Tue Mar 17, 2015 9:48 pm

The reasons are financial, or more specifically taxes. The industrial grade alcohol used in cologne/aftershaves is pretty clean stuff so a denaturing agent such as methonal is added so it cannot be consumed. Of course no one is going to pay $60.00 for a bottle of cologne then drink it, that amount of money buys a lot of cheap booze, but if it could be theoretically consumed then the contents can be classified as liquor and taxed at a much higher rate.
Regards,
Squire

mrscruff
Posts: 29
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2015 11:22 am

Re: What's wrong with this picture?

Post by mrscruff » Thu Mar 19, 2015 12:48 am

I have three Fines, think they're pretty good. Enjoy them.

User avatar
blantyre
Posts: 323
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 8:01 am
Location: Chicago Area

Re: What's wrong with this picture?

Post by blantyre » Sun Mar 22, 2015 2:23 pm

It was probably "autocorrected" by the typesetting program - you need to sue Microsoft not fines!
Rick

brothers
Posts: 17650
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 7:18 am
Location: Oklahoma City USA

Re: What's wrong with this picture?

Post by brothers » Sun Mar 22, 2015 8:55 pm

blantyre wrote:It was probably "autocorrected" by the typesetting program - you need to sue Microsoft not fines!
The autocorrect scenario sounds very plausible.
Gary

brothers
Posts: 17650
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 7:18 am
Location: Oklahoma City USA

Re: What's wrong with this picture?

Post by brothers » Sat Aug 15, 2015 3:29 pm

brothers wrote:Maybe Fine's label is correct to a point, in the event theirs actually does contain methanol for a reason, and it may be that the error, if any, is that they omitted the menthol.
For those of us who tend to follow up with trivia --- the current label on Fine Snake Bite says "menthol" instead of methanol. It was just as we all thought, a typo. Happens to everyone, doesn't it. :)
Gary

User avatar
Squire
Squadron Leader
Posts: 18969
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 3:41 pm
Location: North East, MS

Re: What's wrong with this picture?

Post by Squire » Sat Aug 15, 2015 7:22 pm

I'm not sure I think an over reliance on spell check is necessarily a good thing but it is easy to use.
Regards,
Squire

JayDee
Posts: 282
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 1:50 pm

Re: What's wrong with this picture?

Post by JayDee » Fri Jan 01, 2016 2:52 pm

lol My bottle says pure menthol crystals. It's a bona-fide face-freezer par excellence!

Post Reply