SilkSmoke and SynBad synthetics

What kind of shaving brush do you use? Tell us all about it!
Post Reply
brothers
Posts: 19922
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 7:18 am
Location: Oklahoma City USA

SilkSmoke and SynBad synthetics

Post by brothers » Fri May 24, 2019 3:54 pm

TRBeck wrote:
Thu May 16, 2019 12:06 pm
Gary, I notice the SilkSmoke gets more use for you than the Synbad restore/reknot you did a few months back. Do you mind giving a little info on whether you prefer the Silksmoke and why? I am enjoying my Synbad but do like the look of the Silksmoke knot.
See the attached photos. Click on the photo to enlarge.

Tim, I've used both brushes recently, and here are my observations. The knot measurements (as mounted in these two handles) of the SynBad are 61mm tall and 30mm at the base of the fibers at the top of the glue plug. The SilkSmoke is 56mm tall and also 30mm at the top of the glue plug.

Both brushes are amply packed to the point of maintaining an adequate amount of backbone which is common in most quality badger and boar brushes. I have owned and used several other synthetic brushes in which backbone is slim or none.

In a subjective sense, the SynBad is as soft as a cloud when stroking the cheek when dry. The SilkSmoke is also soft, but minutely less than the SynBad. On the other hand, my SilkSmoke has no sensation of scritch if the dry brush is pressed and stroked against the dry cheek, while my SynBad has a minimal or even negligible scritch when the dry brush is pressed and stroked against the dry cheek. The SynBad fibers appear to be somewhat finer and more thoroughly packed than the SilkSmoke. (This is my brush and my cheek, and I'm doing the stroking, so perhaps others may certainly disagree.) Furthermore, the crown of the SilkSmoke has been physically trimmed/shaped in a configuration that just seems more subjectively attractive to me.

Both brushes are virtuoso at manufacturing thick and rich lather with competent soaps. I am attaching photos that show the visual differences between the two brushes. SilkSmoke is gray and SynBad is brown.

Image
Image
Image
Gary

User avatar
TRBeck
Soapgeek
Posts: 5070
Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2008 1:59 pm
Location: Denver, CO

Re: SilkSmoke and SynBad synthetics

Post by TRBeck » Fri May 24, 2019 9:35 pm

Gary, thank you so much. Very helpful review. I will probably try the Silksmoke eventually, although I am enjoying the Synbad at present and really don't need to...curiosity and all, though.
Regards,
Tim

Why should we not meet, not always as dyspeptics, to tell our bad dreams, but sometimes as eupeptics, to congratulate each other on the ever-glorious morning? - Henry David Thoreau

Post Reply